9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (8) TMI 241X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... out of and is directed against the order in original bearing No. XVII (GC) S-Adj/371/81 dated 9-2-1983 passed by the Collector of Central Excise Customs, Pune. 2. The subject of challenge in this appeal is the absolute confiscation of gold ornaments weighing 132.800 gms. and the penalty of Rs. 5000/-. 3. Shri Solanki appearing for the appellant vehementally contended that the gold ornaments ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n the business premises of the appellant. He further admitted that during interogation the appellant had admitted that he has been transacting business in gold without gold dealers licence in the very same premises. But then it was not to the extent of Rs. six lakhs as stated In the Collector s order but was only to the extent of Rs. 1.5 lakhs. 4. After hearing Shri Solanki the Departmental rep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n who did not hold gold dealers licence above are liable to confiscation and not all gold found in the business premises The arguments appears attractive. If this argument Is to be accepted the person who carries on gold dealer business without obtaining a licence will be placed in an advantage position; vis a vies the licensed dealer. What is sold by the unlicensed deafer out of reach because the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ss premises which should be presumed for sale in the absence of contra evidence becomes liable to confiscation since they are kept for business without a valid gold dealer s licence. 9. In the above view of the matter, the contention of Shri Solanki requires to be. rejected and the same is rejected. Looking to the volume of transactions admittedly carried out by the appellant without obtaining a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
