1987 (10) TMI 232

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Kiimar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.D. Jha, Vice-President]. - We have heard Shri A.N. Haksar, the learned Advocate in support of the application praying for dispensing with pre-deposit of Central Excise Duty of Rs. 7,70,922.95 and Shri Shishir Kumar, SDR for the respondent in opposition. Shri Haksar says that the appellants before the Collector (Appeals) had deposited 50% of the du .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case, the appeal may be taken up for hearing today itself. 3. It is seen that the Collector (Appeals) did not accede to the second request for an adjournment on the ground of the advocate being not available for the reason that he had earlier once granted adjournment. We feel that rejection for request for adjournment by the Collector (Appeals) was not justified. Shri Haksar prayed for remand of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X