TMI Blog1987 (5) TMI 241X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Respondent. [Order per : Harish Chander, Member (J)]. - Narayan Singh & Company had filed three Revision Applications on behalf of M/s. National Engineering Industries Ltd., Jaipur to the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Deptt. of Revenue, New Delhi being aggrieved from the orders passed by Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. The said Revision Applications stand transferred to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the lower authorities and being aggrieved from the aforesaid order the appellant has come in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. Shri H.S. Bedi, ld. Consultant, has appeared on behalf of the appellant. At the outset of the hearing the Bench had pointed out to Shri Bedi that in appeal No. 1211/82-B2 the Collector of Customs (Appeals) had disposed of 2 appeals by a consolidated order, whereas the appell ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e acceptance of the appeals. 4. Shri J. Gopinath, ld. S.D.R., who has appeared on behalf of the respondent, states that there is nothing new which can distinguish the present three matters from the earlier order passed by the Bench. There are no catalogues and other details of the goods imported. He has pleaded that the appeals may be dismissed as unsubstantiated. 5. We have heard both the sides ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|