9911796707
TMI Blog1988 (3) TMI 340X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Member (J)]. -As against the order dated 13-9-1979 of the Assistant Collector giving the reasons for the finalisation of the pricelists effective from 1-10-1975 to 31-3-1976 filed by the appellants M/s. Arunachal Plywood Industries Ltd, they preferred a revision petition to the Central Board of Excise and Customs under Section 35A of the Central Excises and Salt Act. Under letter dated 22-10-19 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... inform you that the Collector does not like to review the order passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Dibrugarh." This is in the form of letter signed by the Superintendent (Technical), evidently on behalf of the Collector. 4. Therefore, this impugned order gives no reasons, and contains no discussion, as to why the Collector was upholding the order of the Assistant Collector ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fer an appeal to this Tribunal. That would indicate that in respect of matters pending before the Executive Collector under Section 35A (as it then stood) the Collector would be entitled to continue the proceeding and pass an order even after the appointed day (11-10-1982). Therefore, the jurisdiction of Collector to pass an order under Section 35A (by way of revision) would continue even after 11 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
