9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 458X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the matter should have ended there and a direction ought to have been given to the original authority to grant the licence. Held that – the contention of the appellant was not accepted. As appellate authority had observed that violation of Rule 7(1)(a) also made by assessee. No reason to interfere in order of Single Judge in remanding the matter. - 269 of 2005(GM-RES), - - - Dated:- 24-11-2009 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Foreign Trade (Regulations) Rules, 1993. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional Directorate General of Foreign Trade who rejected the same as per order dated 9.10.2003. It was then that writ petitions Nos. 51545 of 2003 and 52173-205 of 2003 were filed in this court challenging the two orders with a prayer that they be quashed. The learned single Judge a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the respondent. 4. The contention of the appellants is that the original authority had refused to grant licence only on the ground of violation of clause (b) of sub rule (1) of Rule 7 and since that was found to be unsustainable by the appellate authority, the matter should have ended there and a direction ought to have been given to the original authority to grant the licence. We are unabl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
