2001 (6) TMI 206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er dated 9-12-98 (Order No. C-II/2952-55/98 W.R.B. Dated 18-12-98) [1999 (113) E.L.T. 580 (Tribunal)] passed by CEGAT, West Regional Branch, Mumbai in C/STAY-1716/98-BOM, C-STAY-1915/98-BOM, C-STAY-1916/98-BOM and C/STAY-1917/98-BOM in C/668/98-BOM, C/745/98-BOM, C/746/98-BOM and C/747/98-BOM respectively whereby the petitioner has been asked to deposit the sum of Rs. 5 lacs and his application fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... failed to persuade the Tribunal for exemption and the Tribunal in its discretion under Section 129E has not granted such exemption. In our opinion, the impugned order does not suffer from any such error of fact or law, which warrants interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We do not find any substance in this Petition. The same is hereby rejected in limine.
.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X