2010 (4) TMI 477

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s in the nature of ship stores for Indian navy. Held that - appellant not entitled to unconditional stay of duty amount. Appellant directed to pay 25% towards duty liability after taking amount paid already into account. - 52 of 2009 - - - Dated:- 29-4-2010 - Mohit S. Shah, C.J. and Sengupta, J. S/Shri Pranab Kumar Dutta with A.D. Dey and K. Dey, Advocates, for the Appellant. S/Shri R. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant were for supply "as store for consumption On-Board a vessel of Indian Navy". (A/c. Karmuk). 3. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent has opposed the said application. It is submitted that the matter is covered against the appellant by decision of the Apex Court in Leader Engineering Works v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh, 2007 (212) E.L.T. 168 (S.C.). .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a further sum of Rs. 26,40,000/- by cash within two months from today, failing which this interim stay shall stand vacated without any further reference to this Court. For the balance 25% amount, the appellant shall furnish bank guarantee within one month from today. 5. The stay application is, accordingly, disposed of. 6. The appellant shall file requisite number of paper book within three m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X