TMI Blog2010 (1) TMI 496X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ure of services provided. Held that - assessee was to be directed to pre-deposit part of demand. - 445 OF 2009 - ST/24 OF 2010 - Dated:- 11-1-2010 - M. VEERAIYAN, TECHNICAL MEMBER AND D.N. PANDA, JUDICIAL MEMBER A.K. Dixit for the Appellant. S.R. Meena for the Respondent. ORDER D.N. Panda, Judicial Member - The appellant failed to appear before the learned Adjudicating Author ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rusal of the first Appellate order shows that the appellant is a litigant and carried out the litigation to different forums before reaching here. They approached the Consumer Forum and also to the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court by two different petitions. Nothing was disclosed to the learned Adjudicating Authority about status of the matter before the Hon'ble High Court of Allahabad. With such back ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd looked into the nature of the contract as described by the Authorities below. Finding no case of waiver of pre-deposit fully, we direct the appellant to make pre-deposit of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) within 8 weeks from today and to make compliance on 19-3-2010. If such order is carried out, realisation of the balance amount shall stand waived during the pendency of the appeal. - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|