TMI Blog2010 (4) TMI 529X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and claimed that it received only Rs. 93,750 as an amount towards service rendered by it. Held that - issue need to be considered on factual matrix, impugned order was to be set aside and matter was to be remanded to adjudicating authority to consider issue afresh. - ST/STAY/557 & 637 OF 2009 - 753 AND 754 OF 2010 - Dated:- 26-4-2010 - M.V. RAVINDRAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND P. KARTHIKEYAN, TECHNIC ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to a conclusion that the respondent has rendered a service to the value of Rs. 3,16,104 (Rupees Three lakh sixteen thousand one hundred and four only). The respondent is disputing this figure and he has claimed that he received only Rs. 93,750 (Rupees Ninety three thousand seven hundred and fifty only) as an amount towards the services rendered by them. We find that the issue needs to be factually ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|