Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2024 Year 2024 This

This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings ...


Amalgamated company's income assessment challenged due to jurisdictional error, lack of escaped income evidence, and violation of natural justice principles.

Case Laws     Income Tax

November 26, 2024

This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings initiated against an amalgamated company for the assessment year 2018-19. The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) erroneously assumed jurisdiction u/ss 147/148/148A, alleging income had escaped assessment because the amalgamating company failed to file a return for AY 2018-19. However, the amalgamating company stood dissolved on March 30, 2018, and could not file a return. Only the amalgamated company was required to file, which it duly did. The consolidated accounts were assessed u/s 143(3). The AO failed to establish that items mentioned in the Section 148A(b) notice were not incorporated in the amalgamated company's accounts/return, resulting in escaped income. This vitiated the proceedings. The AO violated principles of natural justice by not granting an effective hearing despite requests. Section 148A(b) mandates granting an opportunity by issuing a show-cause notice with a minimum 7-day and maximum 30-day response period, extendable on application. Though the notice was issued on March 23, 2022, with a 7-day period, the AO improperly extended it to April 19, 2022, without an application. The Section 148 notice issued on April.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of assessment - Jurisdiction - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter to the assessment. In the case on hand it...

  2. Validity of assessment framed u/s 143(3) by Non- jurisdictional ITO - Jurisdiction of AO based on income threshold / monetary limits as per the return of income - The...

  3. Assessment against non existent company - name of company struck off by ROC - Assessment based on Seized Materials - The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer was...

  4. Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

  5. The validity of the scrutiny process was challenged due to the lack of approval obtained by the Assessing Officer from the Jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of...

  6. Assessment order u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) on a non-existing entity - amalgamation of company - The assessment order, referring only to the name of the amalgamating...

  7. Assessment on amalgamated company – Assessment on a company which has been dissolved by amalgamation u/s 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 is invalid - AT

  8. Validity of assessment proceedings - Assessment on Amalgamated company - Assessment on a company which has been dissolved and struck off the register of companies u/s...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 justified due to tangible material available with Assessing Officer (AO) to form reasonable belief regarding escapement of income....

  10. Validity of assessment order - Amalgamation - transfer pricing order u/s. 92CA(3) was passed against non-est (amalgamated) company - assessment order though passed in...

  11. The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved...

  12. Validity of Assessment u/s 144B - Amalgamated company - once assessment order is passed against non-existing company, there would be no cure, even for filing of the...

  13. The case pertains to the validity of an assessment order against a company that had already undergone amalgamation. The key points are: The assessment order was passed...

  14. Validity of assessment on a company which has been dissolved/ amalgamated - assessment order passed on the appellant company was a nullity - AT

  15. Assessment order passed on an non- existent entity - Fact of amalgamation was not disclosed in the business/organization column and the assessment order indicated the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates