2010 (3) TMI 637

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e category specified under the list of restricted equipment, hence no fine or penalty. - C/250/2008 - 316/2010 - Dated:- 12-3-2010 - Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> Shri Joseph Prabhakar, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e been confiscated and no fine and penalty should have been imposed. 2. Heard learned SDR Shri C. Rangaraju, who supports the impugned order. He states that the appellants did not have a specific licence for import of Chiller Unit which contained the restricted substance, namely, R-22. Hence imposition of fine and penalty is justified. 3. After hearing both sides, I find that the Chiller Unit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X