1987 (2) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. [Order per: V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)]. - In view of the nature of the order that we propose to pass in these appeals it is unnecessary to state the facts of the appeals in detail. These appeals are by the Collector of Central Excise & Customs, Jaipur against order-in-appeal Nos. 1856 and 1220 CE/80 of the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi received by the appellant-Collec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... thereto seeking for further reliefs then were granted to them under the order of the Appellate Collector. 2. As earlier mentioned the impugned order-in-appeal had been received by the appellant-Collector on 12-1-1981. As on that date the Department had no right to appeal but could only initiate proceedings for review of the said order. Admittedly the time available for such review would be, at be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Therefore, there was no question of the appellant-Collector having been entitled to file an appeal to this Tribunal but not having preferred it within the time stipulated. Therefore, there is no question of the Tribunal exercising its powers for condonation of the delay in preferring the appeals. 3. In this view we hold that these appeals are not maintainable at all and accordingly reject both .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X