ITAT remanded matters concerning discrepancies between Form 26AS ...

Tax Authorities Must Re-examine Trading Results and Form 26AS Discrepancies After Assessee Provides Complete Documentation

February 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT remanded matters concerning discrepancies between Form 26AS receipts and ITR, and rejection of trading results back to AO for de novo consideration. Assessee failed to adequately explain mobilization advances and reconciliation differences. CIT(A)'s order was deemed cryptic and non-speaking regarding GP ratio mismatch. AO directed to re-examine gross profit after assessee provides documentary evidence. Assessee bears responsibility to substantiate claims during consequential proceedings. If assessee fails to respond to notices or provide required documentation, AO empowered to adjudicate based on available facts and law. Revenue's grounds allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT remanded matters concerning discrepancies between Form 26AS ...

Tax Authorities Must Re-examine Trading Results and Form 26AS Discrepancies After Assessee Provides Complete Documentation

February 15, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

Non-payment of service tax - manpower supply service - differences in the figures reflected in ST-3 Returns and in form 26AS - form 26AS is not a statutory document for...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of refund of excess taxes claimed by the Assessee due to a difference in the amount of TDS and Advance Tax as computed by the...

The AO failed to correctly compute the undisclosed income after considering the correct sale value of land as per Form 26AS. The assessee claimed that one of the lands...

Assessee's claim for foreign tax credit u/s 90 allowed despite delay in filing Form No. 67 after due date of filing return u/s 139(1). Delay in filing Form 67 cannot...

Un-reconciled entries on account of non-reconciliation of AIR information - Entries in the 26AS form not accepted by the assessee - Addition on the basis of AIR...

Denial of TDS credit - TDS is not reflected in Form No. 26AS of the assessee - Credit of TDS which was not deductible - We find from updated Form 26AS of the assessee,...

The High Court ruled that when tax deducted at source (TDS) is not initially credited but the relevant certificate or Form 26AS is subsequently presented, the Assessing...

Assessee filed revised return of income and Form 67 within extended due date. Assessee paid taxes on salary earned in Netherlands under Article 23 of India-Netherlands...

Deduction u/s 35(2AB) - Under Rule 6(7A), the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research is required to submit its report to the Income Tax Authorities in Form 3CL....

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Accrual of interest on FDR - once no sum is credited in the books of accounts of the assesssee, it is really not known how any figure reflected in Form 26AS can be...

Disallowance of interest paid on unsecured loans - Non-deduction of TDS - Once Form No. 15G & 15H are duly submitted by the assessee before the department, then assessee...

The ITAT upheld the revision order u/s 263 The PCIT demonstrated that the Assessing Officer failed to examine/inquire/investigate transactions in the demat account, bank...

The ITAT held that when the principal amount of income subjected to tax deducted at source (TDS) bears an element of uncertainty and irrecoverability, the TDS deposited...

Quick Updates: