9911796707
TMI Blog1992 (10) TMI 177X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ambiar, Member (J)]. These are four Miscellaneous Applications filed by the above-captioned applicants praying that the delay, if any, in filing the appeals be condoned. In all the applications, similar grounds are mentioned and the matters involved in all the applications are the same. We propose to dispose of the applications by a common order. 2. In Miscellaneous Application No. 267/91, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... averments of the applicants that they have received the impugned orders only on 16-8-1991 cannot be accepted. In support of his contention he also drew our attention to the Departmental Records. 4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. It is now seen that the case of the applicants is that they had not received the impugned orders at any time and they approached the learned Addi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espatched to the applicants by post office. He also stated that there is no acknowledgement of these applicants in the file to show that the impugned orders were served on them on any date prior to 16-8-1991. But he strongly relied on the notings made in the file by the concerned officials that they were actually issued on 22-3-1990. We have also perused the same. It is no doubt true that there is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nnot be drawn merely because of an official note made in the concerned record that the orders were despatched on 22-3-1990. The applicants had also filed affidavits before the Additional Collector stating that they had not received the orders in question. Considering those affidavits the applicants were given copies of the impugned orders by the Additional Collector and their signatures were also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
