TMI Blog1995 (1) TMI 201X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t the order in appeal No. S/49-135/86-T, dated 27-3-1981 setting aside the order passed by the Assistant Collector. 2. The respondents gave an advertisement for sale of movie camera and acting thereon, the Department made enquiry about the licit import and though the respondents gave a statement of having received it from an individual who had imported the same, could not produce any documentary ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... efore the Tribunal. 3. The respondents have filed a cross-objection by way of reply. Though, notice of hearing has been served on the respondents none has appeared during the hearing. However, after hearing Shri Misra, the ld. SDR, it is not felt necessary to adjourn the matter. 4. Shri Misra, the ld. SDR, submits that the respondents have not produced the documentary evidence to establish the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|