1996 (3) TMI 251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nkar, Member (T)]. None for the respondents. 2. The issue in this appeal by the Department is the classification of goods described as `washer extractor imported by the respondent. It claimed refund of duty paid on these goods on the ground that they were classifiable under sub-heading (2) of Heading 84.40 of the Tariff whereas they have been claimed under sub-heading (1). This claim was a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X