9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (6) TMI 217X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .S. Venkataramani, Member (T)]. This appeal is directed against the order dated 8-1-1992 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Chandigarh. The appellants herein manufacture bars and rods. However, this products were classified by the department as the hoops and flats and the appellants accordingly paid the higher duty on the goods as classified by the department and filed a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and observed in respect of the refund claim that the appellants have collected the duty from their customers and no evidence has been adduced by them to prove that the same has not been passed on to the customers and on this ground rejected the claim. 2. Shri G.S. Bhangoo, the learned Counsel contended that this was a totally new ground taken by the Commissioner (Appeals) which were not at all a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... en. It is not on record whether this new ground was put to the appellants at appeal stage. No doubt in 1992 when the order appeal came to be passed the retrospective amendment under Section 11B incorporating the concept of unjust enrichment was in force and the law now stands settled that amended provisions whereof will be applicable to all pending cases of refund. In such a situation, the proper ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
