1996 (8) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this appeal is whether Modvat credit can be taken, which is alleged as neither in accordance with Rule 57A nor 57GG. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondents herein took modvat credit on the strength of invoices issued by Ambala Depot of M/s Indian Oil Corporation (IOC). It was alleged that these invoices did not contain the particulars as required under Rule 52A nor the particulars of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r taking modvat under Rule 57A and that Modvat credit taken on the strength of such invoices is legally not disallowable. After hearing the submissions of the respondents herein, the Asstt. Collector disallowed them modvat credit whereas in appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the respondents herein the benefit of modvat credit. 3. Shri Nanak Chand, the ld. DR submits that the respondents .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... records and the Rules cited and relied upon by the respondents herein. I find that it has been alleged that the invoices were not in accordance with the Rule 52A or Rule 57GG on the ground that certain particulars regarding the payment of duty by the manufacturer were not incorporated in these invoices. However, from the order-in-original passed by the Asstt. Commissioner I find that some content .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X