1996 (9) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ering the issue involved, admitting the appeal, the same is taken up for decision on merits. 2. Heard Shri K.B. Kotian, Manager of the appellants and Shri K.M. Mondal, the ld. SDR for the Respondent. 3. The appellants filed a claim for refund of Rs. 22,403/-. The same was initially rejected by the Assistant Collector. The Collector (Appeals) allowed the same vide his order dated 19-5-1991. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... istant Collector on 3-4-1989 against the acknowledgement, which they produced before the said authority and hence, it was not possible for them to re-surrender the same before the Assistant Collector (Refund). There being a specific observation made in the order of the Collector (Appeals), the Assistant Collector sanctioning refund claim pursuant to the said order passed by the Collector (Appeals) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X