1996 (9) TMI 288

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondents. [Order per: Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. Since similar question arises in both these appeals filed by the Department against two different manufacturers, we have consolidated the appeals, heard them together and are disposing of the same by this common order. 2. The two respondents in the appeals are manufacturers of excisable products and liable to pay central excise duty on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ant Collector held that it was not deductible, while the Collector (Appeals) held it was deductible. The Collector of Central Excise being aggrieved has filed these appeals. 3. Explanation to sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Act makes it clear that the value shall be deemed to be the wholesale cash price for which such goods of the like kind and quality are sold and are capable of being sold .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X