1996 (12) TMI 145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent]. Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of aluminium strips sheets from aluminium ingots and scrap both as job worker on its own account. The dispute in the appeal relates to the assessable value and duty payable on the cost of goods manufactured as job worker. Appellant has been filing Price List under Part I for its own products and Price List in Part VII in regard to goods produced .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted in the price list and contending that the two sets of goods were not comparable. Appellant also contended that the show cause notices were barred by time. Adjudicating authority overruled this contention and confirmed the demand. Collector (Appeals) agreed with the adjudicating authority in regard to merits but sustained the demand only in regard to the period within six months prior to the da .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r article. The excisable goods in question were not used or consumed by the appellant in the manufacture of other articles but were returned to the supplier of the raw materials. Therefore Rule 6(b) of the Rules as such would not apply. Since the goods in question were manufactured from raw materials supplied by the supplier and manufactured goods were returned to the suppliers, the matter of asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X