1997 (6) TMI 130

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. This appeal arises from order-in-appeal dated 9-9-1991 passed by Collector (Appeals), Bombay. This pertains to refund claim seeking eligibility of benefit of the Notification No. 69/87, dated 1-3-1987 in respect of goods described in the Bill of Entry as Watercooled Condenser under Heading 8414.90. The applicant made an alternative plea to the claim of the benefit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... alogue/leaflet along with the claim. 2. Ld. Advocate concedes the point that they do not have the evidence with regard to the claim for the benefit of notification in question. Further he submits that their alternative claim for change of classification should have been gone into by the lower authorities. He relies on an extract from the Text Book Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technology .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d the submissions made by both the sides. We notice that the appellants have not substantiated their claim as noted by the ld. Collector. They have got this item manufacture for R D purpose for indigenous development and testing and they could not produce any literature/catalogue technical write up. The same has not been produced even at this stage to substantiate their claim. The case cannot be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X