TMI Blog1998 (3) TMI 313X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dmission in terms of second proviso to Section 35F since the amount of Rs. 17,387.35. 2. Heard Shri D.K. Nayyar, learned Departmental Representative. The respondents were not present. 3. In the appeal Memorandum and also orally it was submitted that the Collector relied upon the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Moosa Haji Patrawala Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay-I, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|