1998 (10) TMI 131

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in, Member (T)]. Briefly stated. Facts of the case are as follows :- The appellants herein had imported a consignment of horological brass strips and sheets. The clearance of the goods was allowed at concessional rate of duty in terms of Notification No. 46/85-Cus., dated 28-2-1985. The appellants had executed a bond in terms of the said notification with an undertaking to produce the cons .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lower appellate authority on the ground that the authority mentioned in the notification is Asstt. Collector of Central Excise and the certificate produced will not serve the purpose. Hence this appeal before the Tribunal. 3. Learned Advocate Sh. J.S. Agarwal submits, drawing attention to the notice dated 3-2-1992, issued by the Asstt. Collector of Customs that the notice itself states two alter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the two authorities have been mentioned. Mentioning of these two authorities are also a part of the cyclostyled material. This notice therefore by itself does not entitle the appellants to produce the certificate of a Chartered Accountant particularly when the bond executed by them under the notification in question stipulates that the consumption certificate would be from the Asstt. Collector of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X