1996 (11) TMI 249

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. Applicant requests modification of the order dated 17-7-1996 passed by this Bench. 2. We have heard both the sides. In the earlier order, the Bench directed the applicant to deposit the whole of duty demanded on fork lift trucks and mobile cranes. The representative for the applicant contends that subsequent to this decision, the South Regiona .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... acceptable. The stay order is in the nature of interlocutory order and no appeal lies against it. Modification of that order does not amount to review. In this case, subsequent order of the South Regional Bench is in favour of the applicant. We therefore modify our earlier order and direct that on the applicants executing bank guarantee for the duty amount within two months from the date of receip .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X