1996 (11) TMI 251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... i S.N. Ojha, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Shiben K. Dhar, Member (T)]. This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 1-8-1988 of Collector of Customs (Appeals), Madras. 2. The appellants imported Precision Face Coupling. This was assessed to duty under CTH 84.83.40. The appellants, however, had claimed the classification under Heading 84.66 on the ground that this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nnot be resorted to unless the goods in question cannot be covered under any other heading of Chapter 84. The appellants contend that Heading 84.66 specifically covers such parts and accessories and therefore, the correct classification should have been 8466.30. 4. The Learned DR reiterates the departmental arguments. 5. Considered. At the very outset we are constrained to note that the Coll .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X