1999 (6) TMI 74

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. The impugned order demands Central Excise duty of over Rs. 83,000/- in respect of clamps, cross axes, D.P. Sets etc. fabricated by the workshops of Maharashtra State Electricity Board under Tariff Notification No. 7308.90. 2. Arguing the appeal learned Counsel, Shri M.A. Rangaswami explains that the appellants are not manufacturers of goo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ubmitted that as the matter remains settled in favour of the appellants in these cases, the present appeal is also required to be allowed. 3. Heard Shri S. Nunthuk, learned JDR for the Revenue who reiterates the findings in the impugned order. He, however, submits that same issue has been dealt with by the Tribunal in its order in the case of Karnataka Electricity Board v. Commissioner of Centra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X