1998 (1) TMI 274

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... per : K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)]. The miscellaneous application for early hearing is allowed and since the matter lies in a short compass, with the consent of both parties we took up the appeal itself for disposal. 2. The appellant filed a shipping bill sometime in July, 1995 for export of dyed printed polyester viscose blended fabrics 95.5% under DEEC scheme. They declared in the sh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... kh was also imposed on the appellants. 3. Shri S. Kantawala the ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellants would not contest the impugned order on merits but would only plead for leniency in the matter on quantum of redemption fine and penalty on the appellant. He also referred to the precedent order of this Bench in Wimpex International v. Commissioner in the Final Order No. 60 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X