1999 (11) TMI 191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ivastava, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut has confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 94,27,454/- upon the appellants herein, holding that the latex solution manufactured by them is liable to duty under CET sub-heading 4005.00 as compound rubber, that the demand is not barred by limitation since the appellants have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the adjudicating authority, contends that since the appellant is registered both with the Coir Board and Ruber Board, what would require to be seen is whether the product is a product of any of the industries stipulated in the Schedule to the notification, and since latex mix is not a product of coir industry, but of the rubber industry which is not a specified industry under the notification, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X