1999 (6) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vadivelu, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : V.K. Ashtana, Member (T)]. - The Miscellaneous application seeks for correcting some typographical errors in the grounds of appeal pertaining to the name of the company. 2. After hearing both sides and verification, the Miscellaneous application is allowed. 3. This appeal is against the Order-in-Appeal No. 369/88, dated 21-2-1989 pass .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 86 because both these legends merely referred to the name of two companies namely name of the company who had supplied the technology under licence for its manufacture by the appellants and the name of the company which was marketing the goods after they were cleared from the appellants factory. He submits that the matter is no longer res integra as the Hon'ble Tribunal vide Final Order Nos. 2437- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e rival submissions and records of the case, we find that the matter is no longer res integra, as this issue has been decided under the citations noted supra. We find in this case a perusal of the label shows that the words "Ameron U.S.A." pertained to name of the company, which has supplied the technology and has licenced the present appellants to manufacture the same in accordance with the techn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X