Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (8) TMI 441

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion 112(a) of the said Act on Shri Rakesh Anand, proprietor of Radhika Steel. The question relates to the correct classification of six items of Porcelain namely, (i) Vase, (ii) Champion Cup, (iii) Peacock Champion Cup, (iv) Gourd Pot, (v) Lamp Stand and (vi) Basket imported by the appellants. 2. The Additional Commissioner of Customs after examining the items held that as far as Vases are concerned, they were no doubt ornamental, but they still retain their original utility value, thus they are fully capable of being used as a Vase. He observed that the same argument would hold good for Porcelain Basket as well. However; as regards three items, namely Champion Cup, Peacock Champion Cup and Gourd pot; he observed that these were not item .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ne, Commission of Customs (Appeals) however held the ingredients of mens rea are absent when the dispute was only in relation to the classification of items and the allegation did not relate to any mis-declaration or under-valuation. He therefore, held that invoking of penalty was not called for and the same was set aside. 3. Shri J.M. Sharma, Id. Consultant appearing for the appellants submitted that the imported goods made of Porcelain were items of "tableware and kitchen ware and other household articles of Porcelain or Chinaware" importable against Special Import Licence (SIL). They had imported similar items on a trial basis on 7-1-1998 as per Bill of Entry No. 613714 which were cleared on payment of duty against SIL. When another co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cter for e.g. trays molded in relief i.e. carving or molding in which the design stands out from the general surface (with greater, less approiximation to the depth of the object represented) so that their usefulness virtually is nullified. Note (c) stated that Tableware and domestic utensils designed and decorated in such a manner as to impair the usefulness of the article. Note (d) stated that such decorated articles serve the useful purpose less efficiently than their plainer counterparts. Note (e) further stated that in case the classification under 69.13 is ruled out then the articles will be classifiable under Heading 69.11 or 69.12. Ld. Consultant submitted that the three disputed items namely, Champion Cup, Peacock Champion Cup and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n Cup (iii) Peacock Champion Cup (iv) Gourd Pot (v) Lamp Stand and (vi) Basket. Appellants seek to classify them under Chapter Heading 6911.10 as Tableware and Kitchenware which are eligible for import under Special Import Licence (SIL). They claim that a previous consignment of the same goods on trial basis had been allowed to be cleared against SIL. However, when they imported another consignment thereof and filed Bill of Entry dated 27-2-1998, the Department had denied them such clearances and the three items, namely Champion Cup, Peacock and Gourd Pot were classified under sub-heading 6913.10 as items of Porcelain or China which did not have the facility of import under SIL. Porcelain Vases however, were allowed to be classified under 6 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... namentation/decoration their usefulness as Tableware Kitchenware other household articles, has been lost. This is an aspect which can be decided only on the basis of visual examination and the general perception of persons who are likely to buy such items. Since it is conceded by both the sides that the items are not to be considered as pieces of art, the test to be applied is only whether the ordinary buyer of such item would still use them as Tableware, Kitchenware or other household articles in spite of their ornamentation/decoration. Even taking into consideration the fact that the buyers of the items may be from a segment who can afford items of luxury, on a visual examination of items we are inclined to agree with the observations of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates