2000 (4) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... yed for decision on merit. 2. We have heard Shri Satnam Singh, SDR and have gone through the records. There is no dispute on the facts. M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. were sending the Trax vehicles with seat and matting under challan prescribed under Rule 57F(2) of the Central Excises Rules to the appellants herein for mounting the FRP (Fibre Reinforced Plastic) bodies thereon. The complete vehicles duly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d been raised in that regard by the Department. In any case, if the duty liability was to be fastened on the appellants, the customer, M/s. Bajaj Tempo Ltd. would have availed of the benefit of Modvat credit. But as the goods were allowed under permission, the appellants did not pay duty and the notice was issued on 5-5-1993 for the clearances already effected from 1-11-1992 to 31-3-1993. 4. We .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X