2000 (4) TMI 265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - Shri Lakesh Pandey, ld. Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that a mistake has crept in, in the Final Order No. 845/99-D dated 30-9-1999. He submits that the appellants are manufacturing and clearing multifold straight cotton reels without payment of duty during the period May, 1993 to Feb., 1994. He submits that Notification No. 5 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... es supplied in plain (straight) reel hanks whether single or multifold; that the rate of duty for this description of goods was 'Nil'. He submits that because of ignoring Notification No. 31/93 which was the relevant notification, there has been grave injustice to the appellants. He, therefore, prays that the order may be recalled and the appeal of the applicant may be allowed by allowing the ROM. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X