Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (6) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Chartered Accountant, submitted that the appellants manufacture P or P medicaments classifiable under Chapter 30 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act; that under the provisions of Drugs Cosmetics Rules, they have to maintain reference samples from each batch of the drugs and these samples are required to be retained till expiry of drugs and 3 months thereafter; that the Additional Commissioner, under Adjudication order Nos. 162-167/96, dated 24-10-1996 confirmed the demand of excise duly on the quantity of P or P medicament taken as reference sample holding that exemption from payment of duty on such quantity under Notification No. 171/70-C.E., dated 21-11-1970 was not available as samples were not packed in a form distinctly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as no clearance from the Appellants factory and accordingly no duty was payable. The learned Chartered Accountant emphasised that removal of goods from factory area to laboratory did not amount to removal as contemplated under Rules 9 and 49; that the Explanation to Rule 9 clearly provides that excisable goods produced in any plant should be consumed or utilised as such in further process; that the medicaments retained as control sample is retained as it is; that as such even after the Explanation under Rule 9, the same will not amount to removal of goods. 4. Countering the arguments, Shri H.K. Jain, learned SDR, submitted that as the Appellants have not pressed the point regarding samples packing being not distinct from trade packing, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s been paid. Explanation to Rule 9 provides as under : Explanation - For the purpose of this rule, excisable goods produced, cured or manufactured in any place and consumed or utilised - (i) as such or after subjection to any process or processes; or (ii) for the manufacture of any other commodity; Whether in a continuous process or otherwise, in such place or any premises appurtenant thereto, specified by the Commissioner under sub-rule (1), shall be deemed to have been removed from such place or premises immediately before such consumption or utilisation. A similar Explanation finds place in Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules. 6. It is apparent from the Explanation that if goods manufactured and consumed or utilised as such .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e of Kathiawar Industries Ltd. v. Jaffrabad Municipality, AIR 1979 SC 1721 considered the scope of the words consumption vis-a-vis use and held that the precise meaning to be given to these words would depend upon the context in which they are used. The word consumption in its primary sense means the act of consuming and in ordinary parlance means the use of an article in a way which destroys, wastes or uses up that article. But in some legal contexts, the word consumption has a wider meaning. It is not necessary that by the act of consumption the commodity must be destroyed or used up. The word use is of wider import than consumption . Accordingly drawing and retaining of samples will mean utilisation of the goods as such for the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates