9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (9) TMI 277X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. Shri R. Sudhinder, ld. Counsel arguing for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty submits that the applicant had taken credit of duty on the imported goods before installation in terms of Rule 57Q(3). He submits that there was no time restriction under Rule 57Q(3); that the provisions of taking credit only after installatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submits that even if it is considered that the provisions of Rule 57Q(7) shall be applicable to the imports in the instant case, spares will not be covered. Ld. Counsel submits that the admitted position in the instant case is that the goods were actually installed and even if they are directed to reverse credit taken before installation, credit will be taken by the applicants after installation. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it being a sick unit ld. DR submits that so far BIFR is only investigating the matter and has not yet declared the company as a sick unit. He, therefore, prays that the applicant may be directed to deposit the entire amount of duty and penalty. 4. We have heard the rival submissions. We have also perused the various interpretations and contentions in respect of Rule 57Q(3) and Rule 57Q(7). In th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
