2000 (5) TMI 413

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed for the appellants as also for the Revenue. 2. The present case has a chequered history. Vide the Stay Order No. S-49 dated 13-2-1998, the applicants/appellants were directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 5.00 lakh within a period of three months from that date, out of the total amount of Rs. 14,29,666.32 and a penalty of Rs. 1.5 lakh, by observing that the applicants/appellants do not have a s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ithout insisting on the pre-deposit which was otherwise required in terms of Section 35F and furthermore, if necessary, the time of eight weeks indicated in the order may be got extended from the Hon ble High Court. Thereafter, the matter came up on Board on 3-11-1998, 4-12-1998, 5-2-1999, 22-4-1999 when nobody appeared on behalf of the applicants/appellants on all these days. Thereafter also, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Order for disposal of the appeal within a period of eight weeks, we fix the main appeal itself on 16-5-2000. A copy of the Note Sheet Order be given to the appellants along with the notice of hearing. The matter was accordingly adjourned to today. 4. In view of the background given as above, we find that after obtaining the Interim Order of Stay from the Hon ble High Court, the applicants/a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X