2000 (10) TMI 242

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an Das Gupta, C.A, for the Appellants. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K. Sreedharan, President]. - These three applications for stay are at the instance of three appellants. All the three appeals arise out of a common order passed by Deputy Commissioner and confirmed by the Appellate Commissioner, Jaipur. In the first of appeal namely E/2658/2000-A duty demanded .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent MRP printed on those packets. The MRP printed on the package earmarked for Canteen Stores Department was much lower compared to MRP printed in the package meant for ordinary customers. Relying on Explanation 2 to Section 4A of Central Excise Act 1944, Departmental authorities directed the manufacturers to pay duty on the basis of the maximum price printed on the package earmarked for ordinary .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bunal reported in CCE, Jaipur v. Guljag Chemical Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (121) E.L.T. 743 (T) = 2000 (39) RLT 371. 4. We heard the learned departmental representative. 5. Prima facie the issues raised in these appeals are seen, decided against the department in the decision of Guljag Chemicals. Therefore we waive the condition of pre-deposit as provided by Section 35F of the Act for entertain .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X