HC held that electronic service of notices under Central Excise ...

Electronic Service of Notices Under Central Excise Act Valid Through CGST Act Sections 142(8)(a) and 169(1)(c)

February 21, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC held that electronic service of notices under Central Excise Act 1944 is permissible through application of CGST Act provisions. Reading Sections 142(8)(a) and 169(1)(c) of CGST Act together enables electronic service modes for existing laws including 1944 Act, despite Section 37C being silent on email service. Court rejected petitioner's argument against electronic notice validity and distinguished prior CESTAT precedent as inapplicable. Directed petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedy with delay condonation application, excluding court proceedings duration from limitation period. Time spent before court would not count towards appeal limitation. Petition disposed of with directions to appellate authority to consider appeal per law.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that electronic service of notices under Central Excise ...

Electronic Service of Notices Under Central Excise Act Valid Through CGST Act Sections 142(8)(a) and 169(1)(c)

February 21, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Non-issuance of a proper Show Cause Notice u/s 73(1) of the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (AGST Act) prior to passing the impugned order u/s 73(9) violates...

The HC quashed the impugned order dated 14.12.2023 for violation of principles of natural justice. The respondent failed to issue a proper and prior show cause notice...

The summary focuses on the refund claim rejection based on the ground that the amount paid under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) is not admissible u/r 9(1)(bb) of CENVAT...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance to notice 142(1) - It is evident that date of service of the statutory notice in question issued u/s 142(1), has not been...

Provisional Attachment of property - money laundering - no proceeding could be initiated on the basis of the notice u/s 8(1) issued to the present petitioner, thereby...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default on the part of the assessee for not complying with the notices issued by the AO u/s 142(1) - Even if the AO issued 4 notices under...

Validity of demand of GST - summary of show cause in Form GST-DRC-01 under Rule 142(1) - The uploading or serving of summary of show cause in Form GST-DRC-01 under Rule...

Electronic refund of service tax paid on taxable services used for exports of goods - Trade Notice

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

Quick Updates: