1999 (11) TMI 390

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T). We have heard M.S. Jagesha, advocate on the restoration application. The facts are as follows. 2. On the stay application filed by the present applicant along with appeal No. E/4647 4648/94 SB(WR), the Tribunal passed a common order on 3-4-1995. The applicants complied with the directions made in that order on 28-12-1995. At the same time i. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unal's finding reported in 1999 (112) E.L.T. 1023 (81 Electronics v. CCE, Mumbai). In this order the Tribunal in identical circumstances had not found reasons to restore the appeals. 4. The effect of revival would only be for seeking dismissal of the appeal as infructuous. It is not that the applicants have lost anything because the sum directed to be paid by the Tribunal has been taken into acc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X