9911796707
TMI Blog1999 (10) TMI 385X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... V.K. Asthana, Member (T)]. In this appeal, appellants have challenged the order issued under Section 21 of CHALR, 1984 vide order No. S. 34/27/97 I B Cus., dated 28-1-1999 issued by Commissioner of Customs. The issue concerns revocation of the Custom House Agents Licence issued to appellants under Regulation 21 ibid with immediate effect. 2. Heard Shri Mohan Parasaran, ld. Advocate and Shr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sion on the submissions made by the appellants as can be seen from the sentences extracted from the order impugned as under :- The Inquiry Officer's report clearly reveals that M/s. Transmarine Corporation were signing Shipping Bills, Bills of Entry, Baggage Declarations etc. for and on behalf of other firms. The most serious charge is getting identity cards for persons who were not in their em ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ispute in as much as that the persons who had given statements against them should have been made available to them for cross-examination etc. 5. Learned DR on the other hand submits that as is evident from Inquiry report itself (internal page-7 and page 42 of Paper Book) the appellants had waived the right of cross-examination before the Inquiry Officer at the initial stage itself. She further ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -speaking order and requires to be set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration. 7. We also find that in reply to the show cause notice while considering the enquiry of the AC, appellants had clearly submitted to ld. Commissioner that said Inquiry Report has not followed the proper procedure and had not made available the persons for cross examination to the appellants. Even though ld. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
