1999 (11) TMI 419

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Kang, Member (J)]. The appellants made a request to decide the appeal on merits. 2. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 30-7-1992 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals). 3. In this case the dispute is regarding classification of the following goods :- Cloud Pour Test Apparatus (cooling), Low Temperature bath Cryostate (Cooling), B.O.D. I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... B1, dated 27-10-1998 [1999 (109) E.L.T. 799 (T)] and submitted that in their own case the Tribunal, in respect of the same goods, held that these are entitled for the benefit of Notification No. 155/86. 5. Heard learned JDR and perused the appeal papers. The Adjudicating authority in the order-in-original followed the earlier order while denying the benefit of Notification No. 155/86 to the appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X