2001 (1) TMI 274

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nts. [Order]. These matters are being mentioned by ld. Advocate Shri Deepak Mahajan, junior to ld. Advocate Shri Vivek Sood. The Advocates propose to move these Misc. Applications on behalf of persons who seek to have the captioned appeals rejected on the ground that the appeals were filed by some other persons, who allegedly impersonated these applicants fraudulently. These applicants s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of impugned order are not available. A similar state of affairs is seen in the other two appeal files also. On the other side of the story, the present applicants claim that, in fact, they are the persons figuring at Sr. Nos. 22, 23 and 25 in the list of parties annexed to the impugned order and that the appeals were filed fraudulently by some other persons by impersonation. They, therefore, want .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X