2000 (5) TMI 515

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... te, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. The dispute involved in the present appeal of the Revenue is as to whether the respondents who are 100% E.O.U. are entitled to the Notification No. 123/81-C.E., dated 2-6-1981 in respect of Transformer Oil Purification Plant to be used in their 100% E.O.U. to fuel the transformer at the time of loadsheding. Commissioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Commissioner (Appeals) is under challenge before us. 2. We have heard Shri J.M. Kennedy, learned JDR for the Revenue and Shri K.R. Battacharjee, learned Consultant with Shri N.S. Dey, learned Advocate for the respondents. 3. The Transformer Oil Purification Plant procured by the respondents is used for purifying the oil intermittently which if not purified will cause extensive damage to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ipment which is directly used in the manufacture of the final product. It is not the Revenue s case that the purification plant is not at all required in the respondents unit. It is one of the essential capital goods for keeping transformer well-maintained for working purposes for frequently purifying the oil used by them in the said transformer and then used the purified oil for recycling. We fin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X