Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2000 (7) TMI 512

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Air Pumps which were held to be consumer goods by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, Bombay, who ordered confiscation of the imported goods and allowed their redemption on payment of a fine and also imposed penalty holding that the impugned goods are used in the small domestic aquarium for producing bubbles; that in the illustration printed on the cartons the product was referred to as aquarium air pump and, therefore, the goods were consumer goods as per definition in para 7(12) of EXIM Policy, 1992-97; that the appropriate EXIM Code is 841459.02 according to which the goods are restricted goods which have been imported without a valid import licence. 2. Shri S.K. Sharma, learned Consultant, submitted that the appellants manufacture .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that the term accessories is used to describe the goods which may have been manufactured for use as an aid or addition. It is also defined as an object or device that is not essential in itself but aid to the beauty, convenience or effectiveness of something else. The learned Consultant submitted that the import of the impugned goods has been allowed in the past without the requirement of import licence and now also its import is being allowed without the requirement of the licence and the confiscation in the present matters is invalid. He relied upon the decision in the case of Bharat Surgical Corporation v. Collector of Customs, Madras, 1986 (26) E.L.T. 866, wherein the Tribunal had observed that when the Customs authorities themselves h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Non-traverse. The learned Consultant also submitted that no penalty is leviable as the import of the impugned goods was under bona fide belief that these could be imported under OGL and the goods were for their own use in the manufacture of Washing Machine; that the redemption fine imposed by the adjudicating authority is unwarranted and not commensurate with the gravity of offence and the margin of profit. He relied upon the decision in the case of Jain Export P. Ltd. v. UOI, 1990 (47) E.L.T. 213 (SC), wherein it was held that while determining the question of quantum of redemption fine it is essential to consider the facts and circumstances relevant to the bona fide conduct of the importer in importing the goods. He also relied upon the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the impugned product falls under sub-heading 841459.02 which could be imported only against a specific licence; that the importer may use the High Power Air Pump as accessories in the washing machine which will not alter the classification under ITC (HS). 5. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. Out of the two bills of entry which are subject-matter of the present appeals, the description given in one of bill of entry is Washing Machine components Bubble Wash ; whereas in the second bill of entry the description of the goods imported is Silent Air Power Pump, Washing Machine components Bubble Wash . The product has been described on the carton as High Power Air Pump and as such there is substance in the submissions of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Similarly the contention of the appellants that as the product in question has been allowed to be imported freely in the past and also subsequently the consignments in question should also be allowed is not correct for the reasons that they had described the product differently. The decision relied upon by them are also not applicable to the facts of the present matters. For example, in the case of Bharat Surgical Corporation, supra, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for considering the plea of clearances under OGL in the past. The appeal was not allowed by giving the benefit of import under OGL in that case. Further, as observed that description of the goods was not given correctly. Similarly the facts in the V .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates