9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (1) TMI 479X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... edi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The prayer in the application is for dispensing with the pre-condition of deposit of duty of Rs. 11,62,500/- and an equivalent amount of personal penalty imposed upon the applicant - appellant on the ground that the conveyors system manufactured by them and cleared on payment of duty by classifying the same under Hea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as parts of mill house equipments and cannot be considered as a complete conveyor system. Shri Bagaria argues that the issue is squarely covered in their favour by the earlier decision of the Tribunal reported in 1999 (107) E.L.T. 774 (T) in the case of Viswa Industrial Co. (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Calcutta whereas under similar set of facts and circumstances, the various parts of the conveyor systems man ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e notice was issued on 6-3-1996. The appellants, submits the ld. Advocate, had been filing the classification lists and price lists etc. The only ground for invoking the extended period of limitation against the appellant is that in their classification list the appellants did not declare that they would be clearing the various parts of the conveyor system in CKD condition. He submits that earlier ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rection cannot be called collection of parts of the conveyor system. As regards limitation Shri Chaturvedi submits that returns filed by the appellants are still pending assessments and as such the question of limitation does not arise. 5. In his rejoinder Shri Bagaria submits that in the case relied upon by the ld. adjudicating authority only some of the parts were being manufactured by the ass ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
