2001 (6) TMI 279

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... am, Member (T)]. Shri Rajesh Jain, Advocate has filed application for rectification of mistake which was received in the Registry on 9th August, 2000. No rectification of mistake application has been filed by the appellants nor there is any verification by them. In the ROM application the learned Advocate after referring to a number of decisions had pleaded that a number of grounds were take .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . From the records it is seen that Shri Rajesh Jain was not the authorised Counsel for the appellants. Therefore, he could not plead that the orders have been passed in violation of any provisions or that the matter has not been decided on merits. In the facts and circumstances of this case, we do not find the ROM application is maintainable. The same is dismissed. Ordered accordingly. - - TaxT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X