2001 (5) TMI 353

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent. [Order]. After dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of duty and penalty I take up the appeal itself with the consent of both the sides. 2. I have heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, ld. Consultant and Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, ld. SDR. 3. With the change in the provisions of Section 4 w.e.f. 28-9-1996, the appellants became liable to pay duty amount of Rs. 4,98,381.14. They .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e required to file a separate refund claim. Accordingly, he confirmed the said demand and also imposed a personal penalty of Rs. 5,000/- upon the appellant, on an appeal against the above order filed before Commissioner (Appeals). Hence the present appeal. 4. Shri Chattopadhyay s contention is that the assessments during the relevant period were provisional and while finalising the same, the Rev .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X