9911796707
TMI Blog1932 (10) TMI 9X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... connection with the Lahore Bank, Limited. The Bank went into liquidation sometime in 1913. One Surjan Singh was a shareholder of the Bank and his name was duly entered in the list of contributories. He is said to have died sometime about December, 1915 or January, 1916. On the 14th January, 1932, the Court was moved to bring his representatives on the record. This application was opposed on the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... no authority directly in point. Reference was made to The Hindustan Bank Ltd. v. Mehraj Din [1920] ILR 1 LAH. 187. The question involved in that case, however, was as regards the setting aside of an ex-parte order of payment. In the present case, according to the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, it was the duty of the court to prepare a list of the contributories and it does not appea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on for the purpose was necessary and consequently no question of limitation arises. The application made in the present instance was simply intended to bring to the notice of the court the death of Surjan Singh and the court was bound to treat his personal representatives as contributories in his place in accordance with the provisions of section 126 of the Indian Companies Act referred to above. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
