1935 (3) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... show cause why an order of the Subordinate Judge of Dinajpur allowing an objection under Section 47, Civil Procedure Code, filed by the opposite party who was the judgment debtor should not be set aside. The facts are these. The petitioner was a depositor of the bank in question. She instituted a suit to recover the money due to her and obtained an instalment decree on 27th September, 1932. An at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... bound in view of the provisions of Section 153, sub-section 2. With great respect to his decision he appears to have misunderstood the meaning of that sub-section. It is clear that only the class of creditors who framed the scheme are bound by it. The present scheme was framed by the depositors with the object of saving the bank. The petitioner was no longer a depositor. She had obtained a decree .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X