1935 (5) TMI 24

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n of one Jai Ram Das for removal of his name from the list of contributories. The learned Judge has found that the appellant was duly served with notice as regards his having been placed on the list of contributories but that he did not file his objection within the prescribed period of limitation, viz., thirty days under Rule 50 of the rules framed by this Court under the Indian Companies Act. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed that Daulat Ram was the General Manager of the Bank and there seems to be no good reason why he should not be held to be empowered to act on behalf of the Bank in the liquidation proceedings. It is true that Daulat Ram did not make it clear while signing the notice that he was signing it as General Manager of the Bank. But this seems to me to be a mere irregularity and not sufficient to render .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X